Archive for the ‘Moodle’ Category

I was talking to a client this week about integrating an open source web conferencing system into their Moodle.  There are a number of options we have used in the past; DimDim and OpenMeetings among them, but one that is growing in popularity is Big Blue Button.

For those that don’t know Big Blue Button is a Web Conferencing system which focuses specifically on distance education – according to their website it, “enables universities and colleges to deliver high-quality learning experiences to remote students.”   Their aim is to make starting a web conference as easy as clicking a ‘Big Blue Button’ hence the name (no explanation provided for why it’s blue).


There are four main elements to Big Blue Button:

The Web Cam – Multiple users can share their webcam at the same time with no limit on the number of simultaneously active webcams

Voice overs – Big Blue Button voice conferencing supports Voice over IP (VoIP) conferencing – all your students will need are speakers and a microphone!

Giving Presentations – The presenter can share their presentation online, keeping everyone in sync with their current pages

Desktop Sharing – The presenter can also broadcast their desktop for all students to see  (this works on Mac, Unix and PC)

A Moodle module for Big Blue Button is in existence and it has been integrated by a number of users with positive results. For more information visit the Big Blue Button website.

Anyone interested in web conferencing in Moodle, or for elearning in general, drop us a line on + 44 28 9028 8830 or email joel.kerr@synergy-learning.com


Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

I’m a big fan of Tomaz Lasic‘s Moodle 2.0 Intro Clips, and couldn’t pass up the chance to put them on the blog so here they are…

For some reason that escapes my technical expertise the blog will only display half the video but if you press the ‘View Full Screen’ button you will be able to enjoy the whole experience.

Thanks Tomaz : )

Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

As we get closer to BETT 2011 I thought I would do a bit of research into reasons why schools and universities would chose Moodle over the competition.

There have been a number of reports recently of organisations moving from Blackboard to Moodle with a variety of reasons being given, the most consistent being the huge saving that comes with eliminating the annual license fee.  I read a report from Vasaar College who estimated a saving of $50,000 annually by switching from the commercial Blackboard to the Open Source Moodle.

But the huge money saving was not the only reason for Vasaars decision to switch VLE, as explained by various members of their team…

Jeffrey Schneider, an Associate Professor commented on the different reasons the faculty where drawn to Moodle.

“A sizable majority of [the faculty] were dissatisfied with Blackboard—it seemed really limited and didn’t offer the same kind of metaphor for learning.  It was very teacher directed and felt more fake and artificial.  Moodle is a much more attractive, flexible interface.”

Associate Professor Rachel Friedman, who uses elearning in her classes, pointed out what she considers to be the advantage of Moodle:

“The automatic layout of the semester week-by-week, for example, allows for an “interactive” syllabus—not a frozen document, but something that evolves in response to what is actually happening in the classroom.”

Steve Taylor, a member of Vasaar’s Moodle Support team tells it from a technician’s point of view:

“Technologically speaking, Moodle is easier to maintain than Blackboard because it is an open-source software—a program whose code is accessible to those running the site.

“This means that if there’s a little bug, or if we want a function to behave differently or if someone has created a great new function, we can modify the program. We’ve made lots of modifications and while that has called for some work on our part, it’s resulted in a system that better meets the users’ needs,”

Another school that recently made the move from Blackboard to Moodle is the North Shore Senior High School.  Again their district viewed Blackboard as being a, “huge investment that was putting a hole in their tight overall budget.”

A report by the school’s newsletter described Moodle as being:

“a stronger [version] of Blackboard which includes more advanced features that allow teachers to become more involved in a student’s academic future”

Some of the specific advantages of Moodle outlined by North Shore include:

“it promotes frequent feedback to students. Students are sent email notices when an instructor has posted grades, added feedback to an assignment, and an assignment can be updated.”

“The grade book tool in Moodle lets you add feedback in addition to a grade or score. Built-in blog and wiki tools in Moodle provide new communication options for group work and journals.”

“Moodle students can access all of the course resources from the course front page.”

Over all North Shore concluded that as well as saving money, Moodle provided a site that was much more personalised and flexible.


Introducing Moodle 2.0

Another topic that is sure to be a hot one at BETT 2011 is the release of Moodle 2.0.  With the release of Moodle 2.0 comes a whole host of new and improved features that continues to set Moodle apart from the competition.

The Open University, who operate one of the world’s largest VLE’s, has recently reviewed their options in the light of the advances made with the various software options.

Having looked at the functionality offered by current and future editions of Moodle, Blackboard, Desire2Learn and Sakai it was concluded that the new Moodle 2.0 was best suited to the Open Universities requirements.

A current consideration for organisations using Moodle will be how to introduce Moodle 2.0 as efficiently as possible.  Ross McKenzie, Strategic Development Manager at the Open University, explains how they plan to execute the transition to Moodle 2.0:

“The first student-ready release of our new OUVLE will come online in June 2011, with a follow-up release in September 2011.  We’re planning to run the new OUVLE alongside the existing Moodle-1.9-based OUVLE for at least 12 months, and we’ll be gradually moving students over to the new OUVLE during that period.”

It is inevitable that with Moodle 2.0 being such a major release a lot of Moodle users will want a transitional period for introducing Moodle 2.0 so as to cause as little disruption to their operations as possible.

We have factored this into our Moodle 2.0 upgrade packages, offering a number of ‘Test Options’ that give  Moodlers the chance to play around with a Moodle course, test site or duplicate site.  This means you can acquaint yourself with all the new features that come with Moodle 2.0 before introducing it fully.

For more information on our various ‘Route to Moodle 2.0′ options click here

Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

Moodle 2.0 is here – it is time to give your upgrade strategy some serious thought!

At Synergy Learning we have been thinking about upgrades a lot for quite some time now and have come up with a number of packages that will make our clients Route to Moodle 2.0 a smooth one.

This is no ordinary upgrade.  With Moodle 2.0 comes the biggest Moodle software overhaul since its inception and includes a number of new features that will offer major improvements to how you run your online learning.

This will require a period of adjustment for all involved.  Read on to see how our Moodle 2.0 Pitstops can help you out with your transition period:

Pitstop 1: Courses

This package is designed for Moodle users who want to try out Moodle 2.0 Courses before upgrading their existing site.

This will give you the opportunity to play around with your own Course on our Synergy Learning Moodle 2.0 site, getting used to the new features before a full migration.


Pitstop 2: Test Site

This package is designed for Moodle users who want to get acquainted with a Moodle 2.0 site before upgrading their existing sites.

We will set you up with your very own Moodle 2.0 Test Site to run alongside your existing site so you can get used to the new features before you upgrade.

Again, your Moodle 2.0 Test Site will be for sandpit use only so you can be sure nothing will be published while you experiment.


Pitstop 3: Duplicate Site

With this option we will create a duplicate of your current Moodle site and upgrade it to Moodle 2.0.  This means you can run your current site without interruption AND get to grips with the Moodle 2.0 site ensuring a smooth transition when the time comes for a fully integrated Moodle 2.0 site.

The Moodle 2.0 duplicate site will also be for sandpit use only so you can be sure nothing will be published until you are ready.


Alternatively if you are looking to upgrade ASAP get in contact to discuss our Direct Route to Moodle 2.0 option or our New Route to Moodle 2.0 for those who are looking to start a Moodle 2.0 site from scratch.

This is an exciting time for Moodle users and for online learning as a whole. At Synergy Learning our priority will be to make sure our clients Route to Moodle 2.0 is a smooth one, so before long you will be enjoying all the benefits that come with this Moodle upgrade.


For more information on any of our upgrade options visit Moodle 2.0 with Synergy Learning or contact me at joel.kerr@synergy-learning.com.


Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

Our very creative Technical Director, Alex Büchner, has been at it again – this time with Moodle 2.0 Administration. While putting together material for Synergy Learning’s new Moodle 2.0 Admin Training Course Alex came across a few problems and solved it in a way only he knows how.

If you are having difficulty understanding the administration in Moodle 2.0 here is a ‘Moodle 2.0 Administration Map’ to help you out (click on the image to download the PDF).

For more information on our Moodle 2.0 Training Courses email me at joel.kerr@synergy-learning.com.

_________________________________________

And if you were wondering how Alex ended up with his Metro style map, read on for an explanation (it’s worth a read!):

I could have come up with one of those serendipitous stories – “I was on the Tube in London last week while dreaming of Moodle Cohort synchronization when this amazing woman sat beside me…Or, how about something horribly sleazy like “Moodle is my profession, but cartography has always been my passion…” I am sorry, but no serendipity this time round.

I was designing the Synergy Learning Moodle 2.0 Administrator course and I struggled with the new Moodle Cohort synchronization. Where does it belong to? User management? Course Management? Both? Worth its own topic? I had the same problem with other concepts, too, for instance security reports (Security or Reporting?), grade permissions (Gradebook or Roles?) or Community Hubs (Networking or Collaboration & Communication?). I started scribbling and dabbling. I drew a Mind Map – it just looked like a graphical representation of the table of contents. I drew a workflow – no good. I started a Prezi – fun, but not what I needed. Just before my right half of the brain started to produce lactic acid, I tried to represent each feature as a stream with intersections showing interfaces. That was better, but I got confused very quickly. Well, more than usual. I needed some colour.

My mum had given me a lovely box of crayons a few weeks ago for Son’s Day. You know, the really cool ones, the ones all your buddies want.  I re-drew the scribbles, but gave each stream a separate colour – roles in red, grades in green, courses in cyan. By this stage I gave up on the allegorical usage of colours and Moodle concepts – users in yellow, performance in pink (hooray), security in black, and so on. You get the idea.

The result looked like an underground or subway map designed by a very confused town planner. After a couple of iterations I was quite happy with the result. And here it is, hopefully providing you with a better overview of Moodle Administration or, if this is not your cup of tea, something to confuse the tourists next time they ask for directions.

Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

“Now used by over 31 million students in over 44 thousand sites in over 200 countries, Moodle has truly changed the face of learning.”

That is the only quote I’ll be giving you from Mary Cooch’s new release Moodle 2.0 First Look.  For the rest you will have to buy the book yourself and if you ask me it is worth the money.

First and foremost a teacher, Mary Cooch also holds the titles of Moodle Trainer and  Consultant at Our Lady’s Catholic High School, Moodle Certified Teacher and Course Creator, Moodle blogger and tweeter and one of the most active and enthusiastic members of the Moodle community.  This leaves her in a pretty good position to be writing a book that introduces the long awaited Moodle 2.0.

Moodle 2.0 First Look is a comprehensive account of what new and improved features we can expect in Moodle’s biggest release to date.  The book is aimed at teachers and administrators who have experience in using Moodle, so don’t be buying the book if you are expecting a beginners guide.

For those that have experience, the Moodle 2.0 First Look provides instruction that can be easily understood by the less technically minded without missing out on any of complexity of the upgraded software.  Here is a very quick summary of the book:

  1. Chapter 1 What’s new in Moodle 2.0 – A brief overview of what can be expected from Moodle 2.0
  2. Chapter 2 Finding your way around (Navigation and Blocks) – Explains the new navigation system and the new way of handling blocks
  3. Chapter 3 Editing Text and Managing Files – This chapter looks at Moodle’s new HTML editor and how new files are brought into Moodle.
  4. Chapter 4 What’s New in Add a Resource – examines the new “add a resource” drop-down and what changes can be expected
  5. Chapter 5 What’s New in Add an Activity – as well as looking at the new “add an activity” drop down, this chapter also examines improvements to the Quiz, Workshop and Wiki modules
  6. Chapter 6 Managing the Learning Path – Focusing on Conditional Activities and Completion Tracking
  7. Chapter 7 Having your say – Moodle 2.0 comes with improved communication; this chapter looks at Comments, Blogging and Messaging
  8. Chapter 8 Admin Issues – Explores what is new in Moodle 2.0 administration settings.

Although there is a lot of information to take in, Mary keeps the reader engaged with a dab of creative writing and the use of handy little screenshots to support the text.

Mary has clearly spent a lot of time playing around with Moodle 2.0 and exploring the new features in depth to be sure she knows what she is writing about, and that comes across in the quality of the content provided.

Moodle 2.0 First Look explains what existing Moodle users can expect from the upcoming Moodle 2.0 release but this does not limit it to being a short term fix.  The tutorials offered means it is a book that can be used as a manual over and again – an excellent read for anyone planning to upgrade their site to Moodle 2.0.

To purchase a copy of the book visit the Packt Publishing website

Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

Wednesday saw the announcement of the Coalition Government’s Spending Review, which will affect public spending and education budgets for the next four years.

The good news for schools in England is their budget is set to rise from £35bn to £39bn however they are likely to be affected by the significant cuts to local authorities. Universities have been affected the worst, facing a 40% cut to teaching budgets; post-18 further education didn’t go unscathed, taking a 25% hit.

Saving money with eLearning

In my last blog post I looked at how top universities were using elearning to generate revenue.  Now I would like to take a look at the money saving potential offered by elearning.

You will only have to visit London’s BETT show in January to see that education technology is big news and big money, but that doesn’t have to mean more budget.  As a matter of fact it means quite the opposite.

eLearning offers a number of money saving opportunities for both education and business organisations.  For businesses in today’s credit crunch society training is still a must, as are budget cuts.  eLearning can facilitate both, directly offering significant savings in travel costs and indirectly saving money by reducing the time staff are away from the office.

Ernst and Young provide a good example of the potential savings on offer.  The company cut training costs 35% while improving consistency and scalability.  They condensed about 2,900 hours of classroom training into 700 hours of web-based learning, 200 hours of distance learning and 500 hours of classroom instruction, a cut of 52% (Brandon, 2000)

eLearning can also offers savings on delivery costs, removing the need for classrooms, additional trainer costs and the cost of offline resources.

In a previous blog post I referenced Sawtry Community College’s aims to save up to 20% of the school’s budget over the next year, basing the bulk of their savings on technology.  An example of saving on resources come from their science department, who saved £1000 a quarter on paper, laser cartridges and running costs by scanning resources into their VLE rather than laser printing and photocopying.

Open Source Software

eLearning software comes in all shapes and sizes.  There is the option to buy the software (e.g. Microsoft) or download the Open Source equivalent (e.g. OpenOffice) for free.  Open Source Software, the free version, is readily available and covers almost every requirement in the national curriculum so it is not necessary to buy any software at all.

There is a myth that if it doesn’t cost anything then it isn’t worth anything.  Open Source Software is capable of doing everything commercial software does and comes without the annual license fee, meaning huge savings.

In Becta’s 2005 report on Open Source Software in Schools, a comprehensive study of the spectrum of use and related ICT infrastructure costs, it was discovered that OSS schools made a saving of 24% – 44% compared to non-OSS schools.

The report also found that the cost of support in OSS schools were generally around 50-60% of the equivalent non-OSS support costs.  A quote from one of the school’s involved in the study (although the specific person is not referenced):

“If I moved anywhere else […] I’d implement OSS because the financial savings are considerable and this releases more resources to tackle successful implementation.”

As an additional benefit, because OSS is free to download there is no vendor lock-in leaving you free to shop around for the best value.

Moodle

Moodle is an example of Open Source eLearning Software and fast becoming the Virtual Learning Environment of choice for educators around the world.  As such it comes with all the benefits of the best commercial equivalents but without the added cost of the annual license fee.  This can equate to significant savings in tight budgets.

In a previous blog post I referenced the University of North Carolina’s study into the best VLE for them.  At the time they where using Blackboard, but found,

“the University would realise a cost savings of 52% in year 2011-2012 by switching to Moodle as the standard University Learning Management System.”

Another example of Moodle‘s cost saving potential is offered by Marc Blake, Network Manager at Highworth Grammar School, speaking to the BBC in 2009:

“For our school to upgrade to Office 2007 it will cost around £27,000 as a one-off cost, but that doesn’t include the cost of re-training and updating all the associated worksheets and teaching material

“To get the equivalent of Moodle for our 1200 students would have cost in excess of £3,000 per year.  You don’t get the professional support, but if you’re willing to take that on, it’s great money saving,

Moodle provides all the cost-saving potential that comes with elearning, and as an Open Source Software it comes with all the benefits of commercial software but without the additional fees.  With cost-cutting at the forefront of every organisation’s agenda Moodle has proved time and again to offer real savings to Schools, Universities, Businesses, Private Training Organisations of all sizes.

For more information on our Moodle services click on one of the following links Moodle Hosting, Moodle Training, Moodle Support, Moodle Themes and Moodle Development or email joel.kerr@synergy-learning.com.

Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

All eyes will be on the government this Wednesday (20th October)  as they announce the results of their spending review, which will lay out public spending plans for the next four years.

The spending review follows on from Lord Browne of Madingley’s Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance. Lord Browne proposes lifting the cap on fees, allowing universities to charge £6,000 to £7,000 annually for degrees, in some cases even more.

Lord Browne also proposes the government withdraws from funding teaching in universities, again shifting the burden to students who will contribute once they have graduated.

The Consequences

If Lord Browne’s proposals are acknowledged in the government’s spending plans, it will have a huge effect on higher education.

The most obvious and immediate result will be the increased financial burden on students. Leaving university with a potential £21k debt (and that’s before factoring in the cost of living) at a time when the benefit of having a degree isn’t altogether evident will be a daunting perspective for any young person.

The changes will also have a knock-on effect on how universities are run and business models will have to be reviewed. Observers predict the closure of universities that struggle to justify the higher tuition fees, as well as the introduction of the 2 year degree. Universities will merge and private universities will emerge. Students will stay closer to home to keep higher education ‘affordable’ and university degrees will be led by student demand.

eLearning

eLearning already plays an important role in universities. It is used to increase the quality of courses, enable courses to be delivered more efficiently and provides the opportunity to teach new groups of students in more flexible ways.

The reduction of government funding and the lifting of the cap on fees will result in costs that will price a number of students out of a university education.  Access will be less about academic ability and more about the ability to pay.

Wouldn’t it be interesting if instead of raising fees to re-coup the losses, universities examined a more innovative use of current technology. In light of the new soft-capped fees, online learning in UK institutions are likely to become an increasingly attractive option for overseas students and offer solutions for people wanting flexible arrangements that allow them to combine work and study.

Top universities are already making use of online degrees to generate revenue. When faced with budget cuts of $800 million the California system’s board of regents were forced to look at new income streams and as a result the University of California, Berkeley aim to be the first top-tier research institution in the US to offer fully online undergraduate degrees.

Closer to home, Durham University generate revenue by using elearning to teach PhD students in Asia and the University of Liverpool have linked themselves with Laureate Education to deliver Online Degrees.

This does not have to mean a compromise on the quality of the courses offered. Dame Lynne Brindley, the head of the UK’s Online Learning Task Force, believes the idea that online learning as a ‘poor substitute’ for campus provision is a myth. Speaking to the Times Higher Education Dame Lynne goes on to say the best examples of online learning were “not cheap alternatives” and required “deep consideration”.

Given the current recession, elearning offers a lot of potential for generating revenue as well as cost cutting. With countries like the US, France and Germany investing more public money in education to aid economic recovery the UK cannot afford to restrict the number of students eligible for university. They are the very people the countries future depends on.

Moodle (an aside)

I could not go without mentioning the added cost-saving benefits of Moodle, which offers the same as a commercial elearning environment and without the annual license fee. And Moodle is proof of the potential growth offered by online learning, growing from a bungalow in Australia to 1,000,000 users worldwide.

Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

Synergy Learnings Senior Network Engineer, Peter Hinds, has been locked away in his office for the last few weeks, tirelessly building our new hosting platform.

Synergy Learning host Moodle and Mahara sites for a number of clients, from individual trainers to large universities and organisations. I managed to catch up with Peter to find out what he was up to and what benefits it will offer.

Hello Peter, could you tell us a bit about the hosting platform you are building?


Yes, it is a fully resilient platform comprised of hardware manufactured by industry leading vendors. The application tier, which resides on the hardware, allows us to assume full control of all services.

The advantage of building from scratch is that it has allowed us to standardise our operating system and installed packages, which will lead to a quicker diagnostic process and further optimisation for Moodle and Mahara hosting.

As a Senior Network Engineer creating a new hosting platform must be right up your street. What do you enjoy most about a job like this?

It really is, I’m not just saying that either!

I enjoy working with the latest technology and adapting it to best suit our needs. I take great satisfaction in the planning and implementation of the project. On a day-to-day basis working with Linux servers and Cisco brand network devices is excellent.

What are the benefits of the new hosting platform compared to the current?

The primary benefit is that the platform is engineered to be resilient from top to bottom. Every network device is redundant and every server is multi-homed in to the appropriate switches. Our firewalls run in a High Availability (HA) configuration with stateful fail-over, meaning should one firewall drop offline the other will maintain sessions without any noticeable switchover.

We already monitor our current platform 24*7 but improvements on the new platform will allow for even finer tuned monitoring.

Security is arguably the most important aspect of any network and on the new platform we have a really robust solution in place using the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA’s). Our data centre also has ISO270001 accreditation, 24*7 physical security, redundant power supplies backed by diesel generators, strict environmental controls and fire suppression.

What differences will our customers notice?

Our high standard of service will be maintained when clients are migrated to the new platform however the new platform does have unique benefits.

One of particular interest is the ability to adjust server specs as required. For example, if it’s a particularly busy time of year for the client they could increase the CPU and RAM available to their server which would allow them to ensure the smooth running of their moodle application under heavier load than usual.

Increasing storage space will also be very straight forward which means the flexibility of our packages can be adjusted and refined to a particular clients needs.

Will there be a crossover period between the two systems that will impact upon the operations of our clients Moodle sites?

There will be a period of crossover but thankfully not one that will impact upon the operation of our clients Moodle sites. Each client will be contacted in due course and provided with details of when their site will be migrated and any actions they may have to undertake. The migration process is very straight forward and isn’t any cause for concern.

Peter is hoping to have the new system up and running by November, keep posted to the blog for more information. For more information on Synergy Learning’s hosting packages visit Hosting with Synergy Learning.

Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment
 

It is often said that Moodle is designed with pedagogy in mind. The developers are very transparent about the philosophy they use when making decisions about the direction of Moodle, a philosophy that focuses on what is best for the learner.

The design and development of Moodle is guided by a “Social Constructionist Pedagogy”, which can be explained in terms of four main related concepts: constructivism, constructionism, social constructivism, and connected and separate.


1) Constructivism

The constructivism theory supports a constructive form of learning – by reflecting on our experiences, we construct our own understanding. According to Moodle.org’s interpretation,

“Everything you read, see, hear, feel, and touch is tested against your prior knowledge and if it is viable within your mental world it may form new knowledge. That knowledge is strengthened if you can use it successfully in your wider environment.”

We generate our own rules that we use to make sense of our experiences. Learning, therefore, is simply a matter of adjusting our thought process to accommodate new experiences.


2) Constructionism

Constructionism is a theory that supports learning as being most effective when people construct something for others to experience, for example I am learning the Moodle philosophy by constructing this blog post.

Moodle.org:

“You might read this page several times and still forget it by tomorrow – but if you were to try and explain these ideas to someone else in your own words, or produce a slideshow that explained these concepts, then it’s very likely you’d have a better understanding that is more integrated into your own ideas.”


3) Social Constructivism

The social constructivism theory applies the constructivism theory to a social setting. Members construct knowledge for one another, collaboratively creating a group culture of shared artifacts with shared meanings.

When people are immersed in a culture like this, they are constantly learning how to be a part of that culture.


4) Connected and Separate Knowing

The Connected and Separate learning theory describes two different ways that we can evaluate and learn about the things we see and hear.

Separate learners are people who learn without including feelings and emotions, trying to remain objective and factual. They rely on proven facts from reputable sources and their own direct experience. When faced with someone with a different idea the separate knowers will defend their own ideas, using logic to find holes in the ideas of their opponents. Separate learners are typically male.

Connected learners on the other hand are typically female. Their behaviour is more subjective and empathic, tending to ask questions until they feel they can understand things from another’s point of view. The connected learner, “learns by trying to share the experiences that led to the knowledge [they] find in other people.” (moodle.org)

For the purposes of productivity it would be best if everyone where able to use both ways of learning.


So that sums up the 4 main concepts of the Moodle Philosophy. As a Moodle Partner, Synergy Learning’s content developers also endeavour to follow these four principles because, quite simply, we think they make sense and they have proved successful for a number of our clients.

For more information on our content development services visit Moodle with Synergy Learning or contact Synergy Learning .

Join our network

Share this link

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine


Add a comment